You're right, Ron. I don't believe in carbon dating. I am also not nearly scientist enough to make any arguements. But this second article does refute the first one.
From Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!! You need to

or

:
"Carbon dating is controversial for a couple of reasons. First of all, it's predicated upon a set of questionable assumptions."
"And finally, this dating scheme is controversial because the dates derived are often wildly inconsistent."
These are both statements that I remember reading when I was in grade school. In my way of thinking, if carbon dating were so accurate, wouldn't the scientific community be united and waving the banner for its usefulness in dating ancient things? Besides, in the case of our Kauri wood, it has been buried in the bogs and swamps of Oz, not exposed to the atmosphere. Testing would therefore be flawed because of non-exposure to the radiocarbon in the atmosphere.
I'm not going to argue one side or the other. I don't even care really. I'm just applying a little logic to the evidence that is being presented. Not that everything is able to be proven by physical evidence either.
It is what it is and we may never know in this life what the truth of the matter is. One thing for sure, there will be a day when we will all know the truth. Then we won't care for real.
Still beautiful wood that turns nicely and makes for beautiful pieces. And that is what really matters now. Fun to think about what this tree might have experienced in its life time as well. I've spent several hours thinking about what might have been going on in the world while that majestic tree was standing.
Rev. Doug Miller